Buildings that are more than 15-20 years old should be renovated. The historic structures were built according to outdated construction standards and so cannot endure changing climatic and geographic circumstances. They also use many energy-consuming materials and technologies that are no longer necessary or desirable.
New buildings need to be constructed with current technology and using as few resources as possible. However, they still require a significant amount of energy to build and maintain. New buildings tend to be less efficient at retaining heat or cooling inside during hot summer days or in cold winter nights. They may also contain substances that release toxic chemicals when they break down. For example, many newer carpets have chemical additives that help them resist stains but can cause health problems if they get into the soil or water supply.
Redevelopment is necessary when an apartment building becomes too small for its residents. This might happen if several families move out and not enough new tenants sign up for available units. In this case, the property owner may want to increase the number of rooms by adding on to the original building or building another similar one.
Another reason to redevelop is if your apartment building suffers from major damage that requires it to be demolished. This could be due to structural issues such as falling ceilings or walls, or because of environmental contamination around the site.
The majority of new condominium developments nowadays are planned and built with sophisticated techniques and sturdy materials to withstand the normal wear and tear of daily use. Even after 50 years, modern condominiums are likely to be in good condition. But remember, the building itself is not going to make money for its owner. It's how much money you can get for your unit that will matter.
In general, a well-maintained building will have less maintenance cost than a poorly maintained one. So, you can expect a healthy return on your investment if you're willing to do some basic upkeep yourself. For example, you'll need to make sure the complex uses quality materials for its construction and that there are no major repairs needed. If it doesn't, then you might want to look for something else next time around.
Also, the location should be considered when choosing between different types of properties. For example, if you live in a hot place where it can go up in smoke at any moment, you'll want to find out early on if this development is equipped with fire protection systems such as fire walls or sprinkler systems.
At the end of the day, whether a building is old or new, large or small, condo buildings can last forever if they are well taken care of.
There will be greater space for housing by rebuilding existing structures, which is especially significant given the present problem of overpopulation. As a result, it can ensure minimum living conditions. There will also be greater room for educational facilities, as education is critical to the nation's progress. Finally, new industries may need to be founded to meet future needs for products and services.
The question really depends on your viewpoint. If you are looking at it from an economic standpoint, then yes, old buildings should be replaced with new ones. Old buildings use up valuable resources that could be used on other projects. They also produce less income than new buildings do. In fact, old buildings can be a financial burden because they require more maintenance than new buildings do. Overall, old buildings should be replaced with new ones because they provide necessary goods and services while also making money. This way, resources are not wasted and a city can grow without suffering a decline in quality of life.
However, if you are looking at it from a cultural perspective, then no, old buildings should not be replaced with new ones. Some people believe that old buildings represent history and tradition, which should not be lost. They also provide opportunities for lower-income individuals to work with their hands and create something useful, which is difficult to do in new buildings. Finally, some people like the aesthetics of old buildings, so replacing them with new ones would be destroying part of our culture.
Dr. Aylin Orbasli, BArch, DPhil, March 2009, reusing existing structures for sustainable regeneration Regeneration, adaptive reuse, and sustainability are key terms. Abstract: Heritage-led regeneration is now an acknowledged and recognized method to the protection, economic, and social renewal of historic sites. This article aims to clarify the relationship between heritage conservation, sustainable development, and regenerative management by discussing the role that reused elements play in this process.
The main goal of this research was to examine how existing structures can be reused as part...
Heritage-led regeneration is a well-established practice that has been used successfully in many countries around the world. It involves the collaborative effort of government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private businesses in order to maintain or restore important cultural sites. The strategy was first proposed in England in 1979 where it was described as "a new approach to the preservation and development of urban areas through the careful rehabilitation of old buildings." Since then, it has become a widely accepted concept that has been adopted by a number of countries including Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States.