Which is better, a wooden castle or a stone-walled castle?

Which is better, a wooden castle or a stone-walled castle?

Stone keep castles provided far superior defense than the wooden castles that came before them. They were fortified with large and sturdy walls, a drawbridge, and a moat or ditch. These defenses made it difficult if not impossible for enemies to attack by foot. As well, the huge stones used to build these castles could be easily carried on horseback or in carts so they could be moved if need be.

Wooden castles were easy to destroy. A fire could quickly reduce one to ashes. During the 11th century, kings began to build their own castles instead of relying on local lords for protection. These new structures were usually made of wood because iron was too valuable to waste on buildings that would soon be destroyed. By the 13th century, most castles were made of stone.

How did the king protect his new castle? He didn't have much choice but to live there! There were no jails yet so he had to house his prisoners where he could keep an eye on them. This usually meant guards were assigned to watch over prisoners.

Royal castles tended to be larger than those built by lords because they needed more room to house servants, soldiers, and prisoners. A royal castle might have had as many as 100 rooms while a lord's would only have 20-30.

What are the advantages of a stone keeper?

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Stone Keep Castles Stone keep castles had several benefits over the motte-and-bailey castles they replaced. They were unquestionably stronger defensive fortifications—until the late 12th and early 13th centuries, stone keep castles were virtually impenetrable. They could also be much larger: while the typical motte-and-bailey castle might have been 20 to 30 feet high and 100 feet wide at its base, a stone keep could reach 40 to 60 feet high and cover an area more than 300 feet on a side.

However, these advantages came with drawbacks: stone quarrying and transportation are extremely time-consuming processes; therefore, a lord wanting to build a stone keep would have to wait until enough rock had been extracted from the right location to make construction feasible. Also, since stone is heavy, a lord wishing to construct a large structure would need a lot of helpers to transport it where it was needed.

Finally, because stone is difficult to work with, building a stone keep required skilled artisans who were not easy to find. Only lords who could afford to hire workers away from their other projects could build such structures.

In conclusion, a stone keep is strong and beautiful, but it takes a long time to build and there aren't that many people who can do it. The lord who could afford to hire builders away from their other projects would have seen his castle built before anyone else's.

What are the advantages of a stone-walled castle?

The main advantage of a stone-kept fortress was that it was extremely difficult to attack, necessitating a huge army, siege weapons, and sufficient... See the complete response below. To access this solution, you must first become a member of Study.com. Make an account for yourself. Are you already a member? Please sign in here.

Other advantages include: protection from fire, ice, and animals; usable as a prison; able to serve as a hideout.

The main disadvantage of a stone-walled castle is their cost to build. However, they last forever if not destroyed, so they are worth the investment over time.

Here are some other questions that may help explain your answer:

Why do we call a group of people who have something similar but not exactly the same "like-minded"?

Because they share views on important issues that affect their community or country. It doesn't matter what kind of view they hold, whether it's positive or negative; whether they agree with another group's views or not.

So groups like clubs or organizations are called "like-minded" because they have things in common. They all enjoy playing tennis, for example, so they're likely to have many other things in common. Even though there may be people who don't get along with others within the group, they still consider themselves part of it.

What are the weaknesses of a stone-keep castle?

Stone-keep castles were far larger than motte and bailey castles and could contain many more men. They were far more difficult to assault due to their massive size. However, they had two major flaws: there was nothing you could do if the enemy encircled you except stay in the castle. And second, they were easy for them to capture if you weren't vigilant.

If you block off all the entrances and exits, then nobody can get in or out. But you need to check these places regularly - under bridges, inside trees, anywhere someone might try to hide - and repair any damage immediately so it doesn't hinder your escape.

Also note that some parts of the castle may be damaged but still functional. For example, an upper floor window will most likely not open, but it doesn't matter if there's food inside - you won't be able to reach it anyway. So check around carefully before you start building up inside the castle!

Finally, keep in mind that if the enemy captures the castle they can destroy everything connected to sheltering refugees or escaping prisoners. This includes roofs, floors, walls, anything that could provide protection or hiding space.

So, the main weakness of a stone-keep castle is its size. It's easier for enemies to surround than to attack. You must protect all the important areas of the castle at all times or else people will die.

About Article Author

Keith Amidon

Keith Amidon is a passionate and talented person who loves to fix things. He has been working in the construction industry for over 15 years, and was raised with the knowledge that nothing is ever perfect. However, while most people see this as a negative, Keith sees it as an opportunity to be the best at what he does by constantly striving to improve himself and others around him.

Related posts