Tall structures can be found in Boston, but not in Washington, D.C. This is due to the fact that there is a height restriction in Washington. The 1910 Height of Buildings Act in Washington, D.C. takes height from the width of the street on which a structure is located. As a result, it is an urban design principle. The act's goal was to make cities more efficient by preventing buildings in central locations from being too tall. It also creates more open space in cities by limiting skyscraper development.
The Capital must be viewed as a whole, rather than individual buildings. Thus, it is wrong to say that no building in Washington is taller than the Capital. However, we can say that no single building in Washington is taller than the Capital.
The Mall (the city park surrounding the Capitol) is a good example of a public space where people can meet outside of office hours. In this space, there are many activities available including concerts, performances, and demonstrations.
The White House is a famous house situated on Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. It has been the official residence of the president of the United States since 1800. During World War II, the house was used as a meeting place for government leaders to discuss post-war plans. Today, it is again used for just that - discussions about how to lead our country.
This is due to the fact that there is a height restriction in Washington. We also have a commercial area cap of 130, which is around...
The content in this article is provided under a Creative Commons license. It can be used freely with proper attribution. See here for more information about how we handle copyright information.
Photo credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images News
Editors note: This question was originally published in September 2012 and has been since reopened due to popular demand. We're reposting it now because it's a common question and something many people wonder about.
Height restrictions were very popular in American cities at the period, including Boston and Chicago. The 1899 Height of Buildings Act stated that no structure may be taller than the Capitol (289 feet), yet why don't we have a city full of 28-story buildings if that's the case? The act was part of a general movement toward urban planning that included improvements to sewer systems and street lighting.
The reason is simple: Building codes have evolved over time, and they include maximum height limits. In Boston this limit is set at 42 meters (138 feet) for high-rise buildings; anything less requires a special permit from the mayor's office. The code was last updated in 1974, so many older buildings violate it by being taller than what's allowed. But those problems can be resolved through a process called "heightening." Hailing trucks drive down certain streets in Boston collecting scrap metal which is then put into the bed of their truck and taken to a recycling center where it is melted down and reused over and over again.
So the answer to the question "How tall can a building be in Boston?" is simply 42 meters (138 feet). And if you want to know how many stories a building has, you can calculate this by multiplying the height of the building by 1.8. So the 647-foot-high (200-meter-high) Willis Tower in Chicago has 38 floors.
A common misconception is that the structures are so modest because a statute prohibits them from being taller than the Capitol or the Washington Monument. But this is a myth. In actuality, the height restriction is determined by the connection between the height of the structure and the width of the roadway. The law states that no building shall be erected within 500 feet of an established street corner unless such building is at least as high as its closest adjacent street. The 200-foot limitation does not apply to buildings that have less than 20 floors.
The reason for this law is clear when you consider how early America was a community where streets weren't always paved with concrete or asphalt. At that time, people traveled on dirt roads, which usually ran perpendicular to larger highways. So if someone were to build a house down by the road, then come rain or shine they would still be exposed to the elements. Without some form of protection, these houses would be destroyed by wind, weather, and traffic accidents. This is why the law exists today; it's there to protect people from dangerous developments that could be hidden by other homes.
In conclusion, it isn't true that the Washington Monument cannot be any taller because it is limited by law to 200 feet. Tall buildings will be built in major cities all over the world if legislation allows it to happen. But since roads tend to be narrower near public parks and monuments, builders follow the law and limit the height of those structures too.
Tall structures, as urbanisation increases, give a choice of housing and office possibilities, allowing a city to thrive without increasing its limits or intruding on green space or farmland. Cities around the world are increasingly building skyscrapers as part of their urban landscapes.
The tallest building in Toronto is the 45-storey Landmark Building, which was completed in 1969. It stands at just under 200 m (656 ft) and has 73 rental apartments. The second-highest apartment building in Canada is also in Toronto - the 22-story Carlton Tower, which was built in 1971. That's less than 100 m (328 ft) high.
In New York City, the highest residential building is the 72-storey Trump Tower, which was completed in 1983. It stands at 1,396 ft (442 m) - making it nearly 100 m (330 ft) higher than Toronto's main tower.
In London, the Shard is the highest building at 310 m (1,017 ft). It opened in 2012 after being designed by Lord Foster of Thames Bank.
In Mumbai, the highest building by count of floor space is the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay's 209 m (682 ft) Pragati Maidan Tower. It was built in 2006.